Welcome!

Log in or register to take part.

CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.

CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here

If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application

We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!

Register Now

1972 D Half Dollar

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cbeam
    • Apr 2023
    • 9

    1972 D Half Dollar

    Hello,

    I have a 1972 D Half dollar I’m looking on some assistance with. I took it but a couple LCS and posted within an error coin group on Facebook, all help so far has ruled out die crack but we’re thinking possible Strike Through of some sort.

    thank you,
    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
    This gallery has 2 photos.
    Last edited by Cbeam; 04-30-2023, 11:44 PM.
  • MintErrors
    Minterrors.org
    • Jun 2015
    • 3554

    #2
    The coin look lightly circulated. It becomes difficult to know for sure if it's a bonafide error or if it was damaged outside the mint.

    The line appears to be dug into the coin, it's wider than struck through fibers I have seen. The jagged line is not normal something I see alot of on error coins.

    IF this coin was lightly circulated, the the line should have some debris in the crevice. If it looks shiny in that crevice, it may have been done recently.

    Let's wait and see what others think.
    Gary Kozera
    Website: https://MintErrors.org

    Comment

    • Cbeam
      • Apr 2023
      • 9

      #3
      I was able to get another picture slightly closer, so hopefully that helps out. I’m very new to this but I was thinking it would be hard to scratch a coin so jagged and no damage on rim.

      Comment

      • Petespockets55
        • Aug 2021
        • 369

        #4
        This is an interesting coin for discussion.
        Originally posted by Cbeam View Post
        I was able to get another picture slightly closer, so hopefully that helps out. I’m very new to this but I was thinking it would be hard to scratch a coin so jagged and no damage on rim.
        That closeup you mention must be the second image in the original post.

        I agree with Gary about how difficult it is to determine with circulated coins and about "struck throughs" not having "jagged lines" but you echoed my thoughts exactly about the recessed area coming up to and seeming to disappear at the dies "rim gutter" area of the coin (although there does seem to be a very faint outline on the top of the rim).

        The small slightly raised bumps on the right side of the recess wouldn't survive the strike from the dies and the bumps happened after the strike.

        IMHO, this is likely a planchet defect before the strike where the little bumps along the edge are PSD.
        Last edited by Petespockets55; 05-01-2023, 03:22 PM.

        Comment

        • Cbeam
          • Apr 2023
          • 9

          #5
          Yes, second image was edited with a closer photo. Would planchet defect be considered an error ?

          Comment

          • Petespockets55
            • Aug 2021
            • 369

            #6
            If it truly is a planchet defect before the strike it would be considered an error.

            Comment

            • atrox001
              • Aug 2007
              • 268

              #7
              I think this looks like it is from a die crack. Here is an example of a die crack on a Kennedy Half Dollar.

              66 BS DDO-004 die crack.JPG
              Last edited by atrox001; 05-01-2023, 04:02 PM.

              Comment

              • occnumis2021
                NumisScholar
                • May 2021
                • 1422

                #8
                Originally posted by atrox001 View Post
                I think this looks like it is from a die crack. Here is an example of a die crack on a Kennedy Half Dollar.
                for sure not a die crack in the OP. that would be one of the most amazing die breaks in all of modern coinage!!!
                coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

                Comment

                • Petespockets55
                  • Aug 2021
                  • 369

                  #9
                  I agree with Occnumis. The die crack in your image is raised while the OP's image shows the anomaly is recessed (incuse).

                  Comment

                  • Cbeam
                    • Apr 2023
                    • 9

                    #10
                    I’m not sure how Coneca works.. Is there someone that decides if it should be sent in ? This is my first Errror (possible error) since I’ve only been CRH with my son for 3 months. I’d hate to spend money to send something in for grading if it really has no value. I very much appreciate everyone’s input so far.

                    thank you,

                    Comment

                    • occnumis2021
                      NumisScholar
                      • May 2021
                      • 1422

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Cbeam View Post
                      I’m not sure how Coneca works.. Is there someone that decides if it should be sent in ? This is my first Errror (possible error) since I’ve only been CRH with my son for 3 months. I’d hate to spend money to send something in for grading if it really has no value. I very much appreciate everyone’s input so far.

                      thank you,
                      i think if you get us a nice image of the W where the "strike-through" occurred, i'd say we should be able to narrow it down for you. it LOOKS like the "strike-through" effected the W in such a way that we can discern damage from error. thanks
                      coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

                      Comment

                      • Cbeam
                        • Apr 2023
                        • 9

                        #12
                        Attaching a few more photos to help out
                        Attached Files

                        Comment

                        • occnumis2021
                          NumisScholar
                          • May 2021
                          • 1422

                          #13
                          ya, i have to go with a legit strike-through on this one. i'll say 99%, whereas i'll leave 1% because i don't have it in-hand. it is a nice error.
                          coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com

                          Comment

                          • Cbeam
                            • Apr 2023
                            • 9

                            #14
                            Would something like this be worth sending off for grading and verification ?

                            Comment

                            • Petespockets55
                              • Aug 2021
                              • 369

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Cbeam View Post
                              Would something like this be worth sending off for grading and verification ?
                              That's a hard one because everyones definition of "worth" varies. Monetary worth, sentimental worth, "first find" worth, etc.

                              One coin would tend to be expensive because of shipping both ways, insurance, and grading fees. The most economical service would be ANACS and if you catch them at a show shipping can be reduced. I'm going to say this one coin would be $25-$35 at ANACS with all the fees and shipping.

                              You are the one that can decide if it is worth sending in. You can try searching the online auction sites to look for sold values. There may be some.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X