Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1986D 50C mintmark
Collapse
X
-
1986D 50C mintmark
Note the drag lines 90° of the 180° of the loop in "D" in the magnified picture and the notches in the top edge of the "D", as well as, it's tilted. Is this a RPM or punch bounce/drag? Other than that it is a nice full strike in inscriptions and date with minor bagmarks in the prime/secondary focal areas.You do not have permission to view this gallery.
This gallery has 4 photos.Tags: None
-
yes, looks like bounce or drag. i'd lean towards drag aka ejection doubling but that is just my opinion.coinfacts.com - conecaonline.info - board.conecaonline.org/forum/numismatic-site-links - briansvarietycoins.com - coppercoins.com - cuds-on-coins.com - doubleddie.com - error-ref.com - franklinlover.yolasite.com - ikegroup.info -lincolncentresource.com - maddieclashes.com - money.org - ngccoin.com/price-guide/world - ngccoin.com/census - ngccoin.com/resources/counterfeit-detection - nnp.wustl.edu - pcgs.com/pop - pcgs.com/coinfacts - pcgs.com/photograde - varietyvista.com - vamworld.com
-
I agree, it looks as if the coin after the strike, the die lifted just a tad to the northwest and sheared part of the devices.
Its vital to remember, that the working die is incused. It strikes the coin, and the mintmark on the working die is a little hole in that working die. Metal has to be squeezed into that hole and then the working die can shift just a tad as the working dies separate and it can shift ever so slightly and damage the coin. That's about the best I can explain worthless doubling.
Things incused on the working die are raised on the coin.Gary Kozera
Website: https://MintErrors.org
Comment
Comment