-
-
another lower serif picture
Screenshot_20260107-042009_Photos~2.jpg -
1974-S_Coneca.jpg Hello signofthedimes,
Looks promising. Can you lighten up the area within my arrows? I would like to see if there is seperation on the lower serif. The issue, my oppinion; is are there any marker's, on this circulated coin; that would make an attribution easier.? The mintmark looks damaged from wear which makes it harder to attribute.Go over to the Wexler Website and look at Wexler RPM#1. I cannot quite tell because the date is cut off where the mintmark placement is compared to the date on your photo above. Check the marker's and see if placement and a marker matches. If so post what you find.
Thanks,
Eric
Moving the post above to the die variety forum.Last edited by eaxtellcoin; 01-09-2026, 08:39 PM.Comment
-
Okay, I'm finally getting back to you. What I see now, is the bottom serif separation looks like a cap, a product of some wear, it has abrasion lines the same that cover the top of the mint mark.Originally posted by eaxtellcoin View Post
Screenshot_20260110-194643_Photos~2.jpg Screenshot_20260110-194737_Photos~2.jpgComment
-
Man the wear over that mintmark is a bumber. The second photo kind of looks like there is an upper serif also. I just cannot tell if that is Wexler RPM#001. can you post a hole date / mintmark photo as close as possible. Let me know the crop size and I will try to overlay but did you find any of Wexler's markers on this coin?Comment
-
There is the same upper serif, but that alone I had assumed was associated with the delisted broken die, so I just focus on the bottom serif. I'll look at Mr. Wexlers die markers then check my coin.Originally posted by eaxtellcoin View PostComment
-
You all should read the Specialty Studies on Variety Vista, The Mystery of the 1974-S Mintmark Punch.Comment
-
Here's the two biggest markers.Originally posted by eaxtellcoin View Post
Screenshot_20260111-133338_Photos~2.jpg Screenshot_20260111-133352_Photos~2.jpgComment
-
1974-S_Damaged_Punch.jpg 1974-S_Damaged_Punch(2).jpg
Valid points atrox001.
My opinion is we cannot write of every 1974-S without looking at the coin.
1) the 1974-S with Broken punch was charactorized as a broken upper serif. I will post my photo's of this punch also. Notice that there really isn't a seperated lower serif. And There was not a South.
That is the reason I asked signofthedimes to post a photo looking at the coin to the north. I also inclueded a photo of that. To me his upper serif is more seperated and if he does have a curl to the south, that is seperated; then it maybe an RPM.
I will post my photo's then look at the marker photo's for comparison.
EricComment
-
atrox001, yes the photo on VV's right looks very close, yet notice it's not as far seperated to the south as Wexler 001?
Back to Signofthedimes: please post a photo like the photo on the right on my post above. Your marker's look a bit different but that could also be die state.Comment
Welcome!
Log in or register to take part.
CONECA (pronounced: CŌ´NECA) is a national numismatic organization devoted to the education of error and variety coin collectors. CONECA focuses on many error and variety specialties, including doubled dies, Repunched mintmarks, multiple errors, clips, double strikes, off-metals and off-centers—just to name a few. In addition to its website, CONECA publishes an educational journal, The Errorscope, which is printed and mailed to members bimonthly. CONECA offers a lending library, examination, listing and attribution services; it holds annual meetings at major conventions (referred to as Errorama) around the country.
CONECA was formed through a merger of CONE and NECA in early 1983. To learn more about the fascinating HISTORY OF THE ERROR HOBBY and THE HISTORY OF CONECA, we encourage you to visit us our main site Here
If you're not a member and would like to join see our Membership Application
We thank everybody who has helped make CONECA the great success that it is today!
Tweet
Comment